Helble, T. A., Guazzo, R. A., Alongi, G. C., Martin, C. R., Martin, S. W., & Henderson, E. E.2020Frontiers in Marine Science7:587110https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.587110 Male fin whales sing by producing 20-Hz pulses in regular patterns of inter- note intervals. While singing, fin whales may also alternate the frequency ranges of their notes. Different song patterns have been observed in different regions of the world's oceans. New song patterns suddenly emerging in an area have been hypothesized to either be indicators of new groups of whales in the area or signs of cultural transmission between groups. Since the status of fin whales around Hawaii is unknown and visual surveys are expensive and difficult to conduct in offshore areas, passive acoustic monitoring has been proposed as a way to monitor these whales. We used passive acoustic recordings from an array of 14 hydrophones to analyze the song patterns of 115 fin whale encounters made up of 50,034 unique notes off Kauai, Hawaii from 2011--2017. Fin whale singing patterns were more complicated than previously described. Fin whales off Hawaii sang in five different patterns made of two 20-Hz note types and both singlet and doublet inter-note interval patterns. The inter-note intervals present in their songs were 28/33 s for the lower frequency doublet, 30 s for the lower frequency singlet, 17/24 s for the higher frequency doublet, 17 s for the higher frequency singlet, and 12/20 s for the doublet that lternated between both note types. Some of these song patterns were unique to these fin whales in Hawaiian waters, while others were similar to song patterns recorded from fin whales off the U.S. west coast. Individual fin whales often utilized several different song patterns which suggests that multiple song patterns are not necessarily indicators of different individuals or groups. The dominant song pattern also changed over these years. Cultural transmission may have occurred between fin whales in Hawaiian waters and off the U.S. west coast, which has resulted in similar songs being present at both locations but on lagged timescales. Alternatively, groups occupying the Hawaiian waters could shift over time resulting in different song patterns becoming dominant. This work has implications for the population structure and behavior of Hawaii fin whales.Please contact data provider[UPDATE] Effort data were updated on 2021-03-01. 14 stationary hydrophones were used to detect. The monitoring effort for the 14 hydrophones were same. The locations of the hydrophones are rounded and approximate. TrackNum: Song Patterns 1: Mostly A-A Singlet, but also A-B doublet and B-B singlet 2: A-A singlet 3: A-A doublet 4: A-A doublet 5: A-B doublet and B-B doublet 6: A-B doublet, B-B singlet, A-A doublet 7: A-A doublet 8: A-A doublet 9: A-A singlet 10: A-A singlet 11: A-B doublet and A-A singlet 12: A-B doublet 13: A-A doublet 14: A-A doublet 15: A-A doublet 16: B-B singlet 17: A-A doublet 18: A-A doublet 19: A-A singlet 20: A-A doublet 21: A-A singlet 22: A-A singlet 23: A-A doublet 24: A-A singlet 25: B-B singlet 26: A-B doublet, B-B doublet, A-A singlet 27: A-A doublet 28: B-B doublet 29: A-A doublet 30: B-B doublet 31: A-A doublet 32: A-B doublet, A-A doublet 33: B-B doublet 34: A-A doublet 35: B-B doublet 36: B-B doublet 37: A-B doublet, B-B doublet, A-A singlet 38: A-B doublet 39: A-B doublet, B-B doublet, A-A singlet 40: A-B doublet, B-B doublet, A-A singlet 41: B-B doublet 42: B-B singlet 43: A-B doublet, B-B doublet, A-A singlet 44: A-B doublet, B-B doublet 45: A-B doublet 46: A-A singlet 47: B-B singlet 48: A-A doublet 49: Mostly A-B doublet, but also A-A doublet and B-B singlet 50: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 51: A-B doublet, B-B singlet, A-A singlet 52: A-A singlet 53: A-B doublet, B-B doublet 54: A-B doublet 55: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 56: B-B doublet 57: A-B doublet 58: B-B doublet 59: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 60: B-B singlet 61: A-A doublet 62: A-B doublet 63: A-B doublet 64: A-A singlet 65: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 66: A-A doublet 67: A-B doublet, A-A doublet 68: A-A singlet 69: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 70: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 71: A-A singlet, B-B singlet 72: A-A singlet 73: A-A singlet 74: A-B doublet, B-B doublet, A-A doublet 75: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 76: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 77: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 78: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 79: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 80: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 81: A-B doublet 82: A-B doublet 83: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 84: A-B doublet 85: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 86: A-B doublet 87: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 88: B-B singlet 89: A-B doublet 90: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 91: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 92: B-B singlet 93: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 94: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 95: A-B doublet 96: A-B doublet 97: A-A doublet 98: A-A doublet 99: A-A singlet 100: A-B doublet 101: A-B doublet 102: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 103: A-B doublet 104: B-B doublet 105: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 106: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 107: A-A doublet, B-B doublet 108: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 109: A-B doublet, A-A doublet 110: A-B doublet 111: A-B doublet, A-A singlet 112: A-B doublet 113: A-B doublet, B-B singlet 114: A-B doublet 115: A-B doublet2011012020170311ground conditionCompleteNone plannedNorth Central Pacific Ocean-160.050563-159.822.82640122.256057 NoneMarine Animal SurveyMarine BiologyMarine mammalsAcoustic precense/absenceOcean-based PlatformsNoneNorth Central Pacific OceanTaxon coveredMarine mammalsIntegrated Taxonomic Information SystemUnknownNot applicableDownloaded April, 2004http://www.itis.usda.gov/Refer to the contact information of the datasetRefer to the contact information of the datasetmailing and physical address

Refer to the contact information of the dataset

Refer to the contact information of the datasetRefer to the contact information of the datasetRefer to the contact information of the datasetRefer to the contact information of the datasetNot providedIdentified by observers or researchers conducting the surveyKingdomAnimaliaPhylumChordataSubphylumVertebrataClassMammaliaSubclassTheriaInfraclassEutheriaOrderCetaceaSuborderMysticetiFamilyBalaenopteridaeGenusBalaenopteraSpeciesBalaenoptera physalus Open public unless otherwise noted. See Use Constraints for details. 1. Not to use data obtained from OBIS-SEAMAP in any publication, product, or commercial application without proper attribution to the original data provider(s) and OBIS-SEAMAP unless the datasets are explicitly shown under the CC0 policy. Citations or credits are suggested as attribution. If the data you downloaded come from multiple datasets, a citation or credit to each of the datasets is required. Suggested citation for this dataset: Suggested citation for OBIS-SEAMAP: Halpin, P.N., A.J. Read, E. Fujioka, B.D. Best, B. Donnelly, L.J. Hazen, C. Kot, K. Urian, E. LaBrecque, A. Dimatteo, J. Cleary, C. Good, L.B. Crowder, and K.D. Hyrenbach. 2009. OBIS-SEAMAP: The world data center for marine mammal, sea bird, and sea turtle distributions. Oceanography 22(2):104-115 2. To forward the citation of any publication / report that made use of the data / tools provided by OBIS-SEAMAP for inclusion in our list of references. 3. Not to hold OBIS-SEAMAP or the original data providers liable for errors in the data. While we have made every effort to ensure the quality of the database, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of these datasets. 4. The burden for determining fitness for use of the downloaded data for any analyses lies entirely with the user. OBIS-SEAMAP or the original data providers do not support outcomes of your analyses that used the data you downloaded from OBIS-SEAMAP. 5. To consider inclusion of the accompanying transect (effort) dataset if available into the methodology of your analyses. 6. Not to redistribute the data you downloaded from OBIS- SEAMAP through any media without contect from OBIS-SEAMAP and the original data providers unless the datasets are explicitly shown under the CC0 policy. Regina GuazzoNaval Information Warfare Center Pacific mailing and physical address unknownregina.guazzo@gmail.com Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific Relational database Helble, T. A., Guazzo, R. A., Alongi, G. C., Martin, C. R., Martin, S. W., & Henderson, E. E.2020vector digital dataFrontiers in Marine Science7:587110https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.587110Guazzo, R. A., Durbach, I. N., Helble, T. A., Alongi, G. C., Martin, C. R., Martin, S. W., & Henderson, E. E.2021vector digital dataFrontiers in Marine Science8:696002https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.696002Guazzo, R2021Version 1.1.0vector digital dataOBIS-SEAMAP2122https://seamap.env.duke.edu/dataset/2122OBIS-SEAMAPhttps://doi.org/10.82144/a804b544Halpin, P.N., A.J. Read, E. Fujioka, B.D. Best, B. Donnelly, L.J. Hazen, C. Kot, K. Urian, E. LaBrecque, A. Dimatteo, J. Cleary, C. Good, L.B. Crowder, and K.D. Hyrenbach2009Oceanography22(2):104-115 All attributes were measured and recorded during the survey and validated by the data provider. Permissible values for date and time and coordinates were validated by the data provider and the OBIS-SEAMAP data manager. Species identification by the data provider was matched with Integrated Taxonomic Information System. All observation records are included.Data were put through the OBIS-SEAMAP data registration steps.20210301Positional Standard Deviations of < 60 mPositional Standard Deviations of < 60 mPoint 1e-061e-06Decimal degrees D_WGS_1984WGS_1984 6378137.000000298.257224 Biogeographic dataBiogeographic dataNot applicableoidUnique ID number (generated by OBIS-SEAMAP)Data providerUnique ID number (generated by OBIS-SEAMAP)speciesScientific nameData providerScientific namesp_tsnTaxonomic Serial Number added by OBIS-SEAMAPData providerTaxonomic Serial Number added by OBIS-SEAMAPData providerobs_countNumber of animals (always 1) added by OBIS-SEAMAPData provider11latitudeLatitude of site in decimal degreesData provider22.256057022.8264010longitudeLongitude of site in decimal degreesData provider-160.0505630-159.8000000juliantimeofemissionDate/time of emission in Julian time, Matlab format UTCData provider734523.86120736765.04470datetimeofemissionDate/time of emission UTCData provider2011-01-20 20:40:112017-03-11 01:04:22tracknumTrack number (refer to Song Patterns in the Suppemental Information)Data provider1115calltypeCall typeData providerCall typereceivedlevelReceived levelData provider16.263133800104.766239200noiselevelNoise levelData provider22.34080657098.719791480peakfreqPeak frequencyData provider11.48148148048.518518520bandwidth_3dbBandwidthData provider1.8200223360121.6589117000subarrayRefer to subarray labeling in Fig. 1 of Helble et al. 2020Data providerRefer to subarray labeling in Fig. 1 of Helble et al. 2020geomGeometry field added by OBIS-SEAMAPData providerGeometry field added by OBIS-SEAMAPThis section explains attributes included in the original dataset. OBIS-SEAMAP restricts the attributes available to the public to date/time, lat/lon and species names/counts only. Should you need other attributes described here, you are encouraged to contact the data provider.Regina A. Guazzo, Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific Nicholas School of Environment, Duke Univ. OBIS-SEAMAP mailing and physical address

A328, LSRC

DurhamNC27708USA 919-613-8021 seamap-contact@duke.edu OBIS-SEAMAP Dataset ID 2122Not to hold OBIS-SEAMAP liable for errors in the data. While we have made every effort to ensure the quality of the database, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of these datasets. Also please refer to Use Constraints. CSV and ESRI shapefile OBIS-SEAMAP Free Go to the OBIS-SEAMAP web site. 2025101420251014 Ei Fujioka Nicholas School, Duke Universitymailing and physical address

A328, LSRC

DurhamNC27708USA 919-613-8021 seamap-contact@duke.edu FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial MetadataFGDC-STD-001-1998local time http://www.nbii.gov/Biological Data Profile